For the last two years, Ai has promised something just out of reach.
Smarter tools. Faster work. Real leverage.
And yet, for a lot of people, the feeling is still the same. You use Ai every day. You get some wins. You save some time. But the breakthrough never quite arrives. You keep scrolling releases. You keep tweaking prompts. You keep waiting for the moment it all clicks.
That tension is the point of this piece.
December 2025 quietly changed what Ai can do. Models stopped being short-attention conversationalists and started behaving like workers who can hold a job for hours or days. Orchestration patterns went from academic to practical. Costs dropped enough that persistence stopped feeling reckless.
The tools crossed a line.
Most workflows did not.
We are still treating systems built for delegation like they are search engines. We ask questions when we should be assigning work. We hover when we should be reviewing. We optimize phrasing when the real problem is task design.
That gap has a name. The overhang.
It is the space between what Ai is capable of right now and what humans are willing to restructure in their day to absorb it. It explains why some teams feel like they are sprinting while others wonder what all the noise is about. Same tools. Different posture.
This article is not about future models. It is about present behavior. About why the payoff feels elusive, and why it will not stay that way for long.
Sometimes the thing you are looking for is not another upgrade.
It is a different way of working.
No comments:
Post a Comment